State system profile

PFAS in Delaware drinking water

This page summarizes active community water systems with enough required EPA UCMR 5 samples to calculate a yearly average. It uses EPA’s final dataset released August 2026.

Source EPA UCMR 5 Period 2023–2025 Systems included 35 Release ucmr5-final-aug2026-website-v1
Systems with a yearly average above an EPA comparison level
34.3%12 of 35 active community water systems

All 35 systems met the sampling requirement for a yearly average. Of those systems, 12 had at least one yearly average above an EPA comparison level and 23 did not.

EPA-based study benchmark: a fixed, unrounded research cutoff used to reproduce EPA’s final UCMR 5 technical-assistance classification based on the April 2024 federal levels. It is not a current federal or state standard. The label does not determine compliance, household exposure, or health risk.

State rules: The labels on this page use fixed research cutoffs based on the April 2024 federal levels. Delaware may use different current standards or guidance. These UCMR 5 results do not determine current federal or state compliance. Find the official Delaware drinking-water program →

Find your water system

A ZIP code finds possible public water systems for an area; it cannot identify the supplier for a specific home. Confirm the provider using a water bill or utility record.

System counts in Delaware

Each count shows how many included water systems had a yearly average above the named EPA comparison level.

Community water systems with yearly averages above the EPA comparison levels used in the final August 2026 website release for Delaware.
EPA rounding cutoffSystems above comparison levelWater systems includedPercent
PFOA: 4 ppt level; unrounded average ≥4.05 ppt after applying EPA rounding93525.7%
PFOS: 4 ppt level; unrounded average ≥4.05 ppt after applying EPA rounding83522.9%
PFHxS: 10 ppt level; unrounded average ≥15 ppt after applying EPA rounding0350.0%
PFNA: 10 ppt level; unrounded average ≥15 ppt after applying EPA rounding1352.9%
HFPO-DA: 10 ppt level; unrounded average ≥15 ppt after applying EPA rounding0350.0%
Hazard Index: 1 level; unrounded index ≥1.5 and at least two detected components1352.9%

Community water systems with complete monitoring

“Complete monitoring” means at least one sampling location had every required sample needed to calculate a yearly average. It does not mean every location or home was tested. Each PWSID appears once, preventing double counting across ZIP associations.

Active community water systems with complete UCMR 5 monitoring in Delaware.
Public water systemPWSIDPopulation servedPrimary sourceSampling locationsEPA comparison result
ARTESIAN NORTHERN SUSSEX REGIONALDE00200035,511Ground water3No available average above comparison levels
ARTESIAN WATER COMPANYDE0000552231,114Surface water purchased22Above an EPA comparison level
BAYSIDE PUMP DISTRICTDE00A08378,400Ground water2No available average above comparison levels
BETHANY BAY PUMP DISTRICTDE000022151,000Ground water5Above an EPA comparison level
BETHANY BEACH WATER DEPARTMENTDE000055612,000Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
BRIDGEVILLE WATER DEPARTMENTDE00005596,000Ground water3No available average above comparison levels
CAMDEN PUMP DISTRICTDE000012417,208Ground water5No available average above comparison levels
CAMDEN WYOMING SEWER AND WATER AUTHORITYDE00005635,000Ground water3No available average above comparison levels
CHURCH CREEKDE00A04289,654Ground water5No available average above comparison levels
DELMAR UTILITY COMM (TN OF DELMAR)DE00005672,027Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
DEWEY BEACH WATER DEPARTMENTDE000082531,000Ground water purchased1Above an EPA comparison level
DOVER AIR FORCE BASEDE000057911,000Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
DOVER WATER DEPARTMENTDE000057139,491Ground water16No available average above comparison levels
EAST NCC DISTRICTDE00A03345,538Ground water2No available average above comparison levels
GARRISON LAKE PUMP DISTRICTDE000000417,148Ground water3No available average above comparison levels
GEORGETOWN WATER DEPARTMENTDE00005927,259Ground water2Above an EPA comparison level
LAUREL WATER DEPARTMENTDE00005973,984Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
LEWES BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKSDE00006029,627Ground water1Above an EPA comparison level
LONG NECK WATER COMPANYDE000062511,000Ground water4No available average above comparison levels
MIDDLETOWN WATER DEPARTMENT, DEDE000061417,700Surface water purchased2No available average above comparison levels
MILFORD WATER DEPARTMENTDE00006169,800Ground water5No available average above comparison levels
MILLSBORO WATER DEPARTMENTDE00006228,568Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMISSIONDE00006345,549Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
NEWARK WATER DEPARTMENT, DEDE000063040,000Surface water2Above an EPA comparison level
NORTH WEST PUMP DISTRICTDE00A03474,149Ground water3No available average above comparison levels
REHOBOTH BEACH WATER DEPARTMENTDE000072325,000Ground water3Above an EPA comparison level
REHOBOTH PUMP DISTRICTDE000099181,417Ground water12No available average above comparison levels
SEAFORD WATER DEPARTMENTDE00002466,699Ground water2No available average above comparison levels
SMYRNA WATER DEPARTMENTDE000065711,813Ground water3Above an EPA comparison level
SOUTH BETHANYDE00A032318,215Ground water3Above an EPA comparison level
STAGE VILLAGE MHCDE000056993Ground water1Above an EPA comparison level
SUEZ WATER DELAWAREDE0000564100,495Surface water2Above an EPA comparison level
SUSSEX SHORES WATER COMPANYDE000055712,450Ground water2No available average above comparison levels
SWANN KEYSDE00004651,764Ground water1No available average above comparison levels
WILMINGTON WATER DEPARTMENTDE0000663107,976Surface water2Above an EPA comparison level

What is included

Each active community water system with enough required samples for a yearly average is counted once, even if it is linked with several ZIP codes. Private wells are excluded, and UCMR 5 did not comprehensively monitor every small system.

Related links